The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Unionization Rates and the "Demand for Unionization" in North America

by David Doorey November 4, 2010
written by David Doorey November 4, 2010

Stats Canada’s latest numbers are out on unionization in Canada. They show that the unionization rate in Canada rose last year from 29.5% to 29.6%, which is about 4.2 million union members out of about 14.3 million employees.   Women’s share of the unionized workers continued to grow.  The percentage of women who are unionized is now about 31%, while the percentage of men in unions is close to 28%.   Much of that story is explained by differences between the public and private sectors.  The percentage of unionized women in the private sector is 12.7% (compared to 19.2% for me), but it is 73% in the public sector (compared to 67.5% for men).
Does the fact that 29.6% of Canadian employees are unionized mean that about that percentage are supportive of unions?
This is a question examined in a book by a former professor of mine, Noah Meltz (who passed away a few years ago) and Professor Lipset called The Paradox of American Unionism.  Here’s some of the results of their surveys of American and Canadian workers:
Percentage of Unionized Workers Who  Would Vote to Remain in the Union if Asked to Vote:
U.S.:   90.5%        Canada:  85.8%
These numbers indicate that 9.5% of American union members and 14.2% of Canadian union members are what the authors call “unwilling union members”.  That is, they are in a union but would prefer not to be.   The vast majority of union members would choose to remain union members if given the choice to leave.
Percentage of Non-Union Workers Who Would Vote for a Union if Given the Opportunity
U.S.:    48.2%        Canada:   33%
That’s a remarkable statistic.  It means that about half of non-union American workers, and one-third of Canadian workers would like to be in a union, but can’t get access to one.
Total Percentage of Workers Who Would Like to Be in a Union or to Remain in a Union
U.S.    55%       Canada:  52%
These statistics certainly challenge the perspective often presented in the business media that most people believe that unions are unnecessary and are opposed to unions.  There is still quite strong support for unions, it turns out.
Keep in mind that the unionization rate in the U.S. is about 16%, compared to about 30% in Canada.   The authors of the book conclude that almost all of the difference between unionization rates in Canada and the U.S. (90 percent of the difference) is explained by “supply side” factors.  This means that the explanation lies in much greater “frustrated demand” for unionization in the U.S..    Something is preventing American workers from accessing collective bargaining to a higher degree than Canadians.
What could that be?
A usual explanation is that the legal model in Canada gives greater protection for the right to unionize than the American model.  It is much easier for American employers to interfere with the ability of workers to opt for collective bargaining, for a variety of reasons.
If over 50% of workers want to be unionized, but only 16% (U.S.) and 30% (Canada) are unionized, does this mean to you that there is a failure of the legal model facilitating union organizing?  Should the state change the model to make it easier for those workers who want a union to unionize?  Or, is “frustrated union demand” not a problem that the state should worry about?

3 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Human Resource Professional Association Offers Credit for Union Avoidance Education
next post
Mandatory Retirement and Airline Pilots

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
1h

It’s crazy that fast food restaurants include non-competes in employment contracts for cooks and front line staff to stop them from leaving.

Never mind whether it’s legal—in Canada, those clauses are definitely not enforceable—it’s just sleazy. Terrible ethics.

Sandeep Vaheesan @sandeepvaheesan

Nice!

Reply on Twitter 1623168822235615232 Retweet on Twitter 1623168822235615232 5 Like on Twitter 1623168822235615232 9 Twitter 1623168822235615232
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
1h

President Biden calls for passage of #PROAct

Act bans employer captive audience anti-union meetings;

Expands def of “employee” to capture essentially what we call “dependent contractors” in Canada;

Increase penalties for unfair labor practices;

Doesn’t adopt card-check.

Steven Greenhouse @greenhousenyt

President Biden: "I'm so sick and tired of companies breaking the law when workers are seeking to unionize"

Reply on Twitter 1623164729530191874 Retweet on Twitter 1623164729530191874 Like on Twitter 1623164729530191874 7 Twitter 1623164729530191874
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
5h

My fingers are just too big to play an A chord on the #guitar.

Otherwise I would be a rock star. This is the only thing holding me back.

Reply on Twitter 1623109078431027200 Retweet on Twitter 1623109078431027200 Like on Twitter 1623109078431027200 12 Twitter 1623109078431027200
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.