Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Unions and Collective Bargaining

Unifor’s Mass Mobilizations and the Future of Canadian Labour

by Fred Wilson March 2, 2020
written by Fred Wilson March 2, 2020

In the depth of a Canadian winter, a picket line at an oil refinery in Regina captured the attention of trade union activists across Canada.  The Federated Co-operatives Limited Co-Op Refinery locked out 730 members of Unifor Local 594 on December 5, intent on continuing production using scabs.  The union’s picketing forced the Co-op to use helicopters to transport supplies and scabs into the refinery until court injunctions limited the union’s picket line presence. 

On January 8 Unifor responded by making a call for hundreds of union members across Canada to travel to Regina and join the picket lines. When those members arrived it did not take long for matters to escalate and Unifor National President Jerry Dias, Western Region Director Gavin McGarrigle and a dozen other Unifor staff and activists were arrested on Jan 20.  CLC President Hassan Yussuff and a group of Canadian labour leaders flew to Regina in a display of solidarity that would have been quite unexpected a week before. 

It was not the first time that Unifor’s actions have put Canadian labour in focus. Since its founding in 2013 a disproportionate share of public attention and trade union debates have been in reaction to this new Canadian union.  Much of the discussion about Unifor has been over its political influence, the NAFTA renegotiation, the campaign against General Motors and, among trade union leaders, its withdrawal from the CLC in 2018. 

The dramatic picket line showdown in Regina was not Unifor’s first mass mobilization or defiance of conventional restraints on union militancy. Notably there were three similar actions over the past two years at a salt mine in Goderich, Ont., a public health clinic in Thunder Bay, Ont. and at an aerospace facility in Gander, Nfld. 

Each relied on hundreds of activists in dramatic actions that pushed well beyond the boundaries of “legal” picketing, lasting days and weeks until resolutions were reached.  Each involved an almost unlimited commitment of resources by the national union to support relatively small groups of workers. These actions were extraordinary in recent Canadian labour relations and within Unifor they were powerful solidarity building events. 

Unifor’s impact, profile and controversies are an enigma to some, but not to those familiar with its origins and foundational mission.  In December 2011 the idea of a new Canadian union was set out in a hard-hitting assessment of the state of the Canadian labour movement, A Moment of Truth.  The “truths” that labour had to face up to were extensive, profound and threatening including declining private sector density and share of wealth, new political hostility and aggressive attacks by employers, and paralysis and dysfunction of some labour centrals.  One of those truths stands out today: “(the) failure of the labour movement to significantly restructure with the ability to initiate and lead powerful campaigns…”. The answer to these challenges, the paper argued, had to be “a new kind of unionism.”  Two years later a new union, Unifor was created with a mandate, structures and resources to implement that vision.

I am not suggesting that Unifor on its own can single-handedly transform the larger movement. What is important about Unifor is that it is the first modern, Canadian union to set out on a project of union renewal in such a comprehensive way.  As Canadian labour activists and more importantly as whole unions break with outdated, broken models of organizing, representation and politics, they will inevitably go over much of the ground that Unifor has walked through, but also go in other new and important directions.  

Ranking high on this agenda must be an ability to leverage and extend the power of organized labour to the majority working class for whom collective bargaining continues to be largely irrelevant.  Posing this question immediately turns discussion to the need for a thorough going social unionism that extends well beyond the limits of traditional craft and industrial unionism.  

The truth is that there is little interest or capacity from most of Canada’s unions to organize and represent workers in low density sectors, or in small workplaces.  About 30% of workers and about 90% of all workplaces have 19 or fewer employees — practically ineligible for unionization, as the Ontario Changing Workplaces Review concluded.  How will these workers ever understand the solidarity that the members of Local 594 feel today?

In Canadian terms, the Co-Op Refinery is not a small workplace, with over 700 workers. However, the entire Canadian unionized oil sector today is a shadow of the industry of the past, numbering less than 10,000 workers in all, and the Co-Op is a stand-alone operation in a sector dominated by vertically integrated global companies like Suncor and Exxon (Imperial).  Unifor’s mass mobilization in Gander at DJ Composites was on behalf of just 30 workers locked out — and largely forgotten for a year and a half. The encirclement and closure of the Port Arthur Health Centre (Thunder Bay) secured a contract for 65 women, employed by local doctors.  The blockade that stopped scabs from entering or leaving the US owned Compass mine in Goderich evened the playing field for 340 miners.  These workers already were organized, but when their struggles unexpectedly became the cause and focus of the entire national union it sent a broader message of how a union and collective action could change outcomes in their small communities and workplaces.

Mass mobilizations such as these do not become part of a union culture easily or without supporting structures and a clear mission in which large numbers of members see themselves as a social movement.  To some extent the Regina picket line may seem like old style unionism. But I argue it is a new kind of unionism for a new economy and working class.  To the extent that it is a protest against a rogue employer, its lasting impact will be limited.  To the extent that it sets another precedent and standard that Unifor members and others understand as solidarity that can be there for them also, it is movement building.

The show of solidarity from many CLC affiliates and leaders also signaled that there may soon be discussions on the underlying issues that led to Unifor’s withdrawal from the CLC.  That also would be a welcome outcome of the Co-Op Refinery struggle and perhaps facilitate a sorely needed assessment of where Canadian labour finds itself today and whether it can find the way forward “to initiate and lead powerful campaigns” of solidarity on a regular basis that would support large and small groups of workers that need it most.

Fred Wilson, “Unifor’s Mass Mobilizations and the Future of Canadian Labour” Canadian Law of Work Forum (March 2 2020): https://lawofwork.ca/unifors-mass-mobilizations-and-the-future-of-canadian-labour/

For readers interested in the New Union Project and the creation of Unifor, A New Kind of Union, Unifor and the birth of the modern Canadian union, was published in 2019 by James and Lorimer and Co., by Fred Wilson, with forwards by Jerry Dias and Peter Kennedy and an afterword by Jim Stanford.

0 comment
1
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
Fred Wilson

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
Academic Freedom and Labour Law in Canada
next post
The Idea of Graduated Collective Labour Rights

You may also like

Real Pleadings: Has Uber Created a New Service...

February 15, 2021

Prof. Doorey’s Updated Beginners’ Guide to the Charter...

February 1, 2021

Calling the Shots: Is Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination a...

January 29, 2021

What is a Minority Union?

January 4, 2021

Canadian Bar Association Podcast: “After the Pandemic: Protecting...

December 17, 2020

David Doorey on Jacobin: “Collective Bargaining Needs a...

December 16, 2020

Arbitrator: Employees Must Get Swabbed for COVID

December 16, 2020

“Autonomous Worker” Regulation

December 1, 2020

Reflecting on the Use of Neutrality Agreements in...

November 27, 2020

Video: Prof. David Doorey and Lawyer Ryan White...

November 26, 2020

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 219 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
24 Feb

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211853Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
24 Feb

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923168Like on Twitter 136462397617409231613Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
24 Feb

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.