The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

The Real Reason Mayor Ford Will Be Giving City Employees a Nice Raise?

by David Doorey January 28, 2011
written by David Doorey January 28, 2011
    The nonunion employees of the City of Toronto should be buying the unionized employees a drink.
    Did you catch the story today that has Mayor Ford and his buddies on Council stumbling to try and explain why, despite his promise to cut and slash and “remove all the gravy” from City employees, they intend to give employees a 2.25 % raise, costing “taxpayers” nearly $ 9 million dollars this year alone?  Outrageous!!  Those lazy City bastards getting a raise!  Don’t they know that in the private sector people are all losing their jobs.  Time to get rid of Ford, dammit.  Time to contract out all the City employees…
    Oh, wait a minute…  these are nonunion employees. I take that all back.  It’s only unionized public  employees who are lazy, gravy slurping, pigs.  I don’t mind my tax dollars going to hard-working, nonunion employees.  Glad we got that sorted out.
    Actually, the nonunion employees owe their raise directly to the efforts of the unionized employees.  That is one of the important things that unions do.  When they win improvements for their members, those benefits often trickle down to nonunion employees.  Industrial relations scholars call this the “indirect” union effects. Nonunion Toyota workers earn good wages because unionized workers at GM, Ford, and Chrysler do.  A real threat of unionization encouraged nonunion employers to match or come close to matching unionized rates in the industry.

    “The non-union people have taken their lumps over the years,” Holyday said. “I think it will be difficult for council not to give the non-union the same increase as the union people are getting.”

    When the unionized City employees bargained a raise above 2% last year, the City (under Mayor Miller… I wonder how Ford voted on that move?) froze wages of the nonunion staff (or in some cases gave a smaller raise), because he could. [Just like Premier McGuinty froze nonunion provincial employee wages last year, but not unionized provincial workers]
    Do you think the wage freeze at the City of Toronto pissed off the nonunion workers?  You betta ya.  In fact, they began seriously exploring unionizing themselves, as I noted before. So Ford and his cronies have to do something to throw water on that idea.  A nice big raise for the nonunion staff might just put an end to whatever momentum that campaign has.
    That’s why the nonunion staff should give CUPE a nice big kiss!
    [P.S.  For labour law students: Is it unlawful for an employer to grant a raise to nonunion workers if the objective is to discourage them from supporting a union organizing campaign?   Hmmm.   Take a look at Section 70 and 72 of the Labour Relations Act.  Does this cover an employer giving a raise during an organizing campaign?  How would you prove that part of the motivation for the raise is to influence the organizing campaign?]

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Can your Employer Fire You For Shaving Your Hair Off?
next post
What if an Arbitrator and the Human Rights Tribunal Disagree About Whether an Employer Legally Dismissed an Employee?

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
josheidelson Josh Eidelson @josheidelson ·
5h

Scoop: Labor Board prosecutors have concluded Starbucks illegally refused to fairly negotiate at dozens of newly-unionized cafes across the country https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-28/starbucks-illegally-refused-to-bargain-on-zoom-nlrb-lawyer-says Starbucks’ refusal to negotiate if some workers participated via Zoom was illegal, NLRB general counsel says

Reply on Twitter 1640509028567506950 Retweet on Twitter 1640509028567506950 140 Like on Twitter 1640509028567506950 412 Twitter 1640509028567506950
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
alexisshotwell Alexis Shotwell @alexisshotwell ·
10h

This morning the president of @Carleton_U sent out a note underlining his understanding of “how painful labour disruptions can be to communities,” pleading for us to be calm and respectful and to support our students at the end of term. 1/

Reply on Twitter 1640430514627551256 Retweet on Twitter 1640430514627551256 84 Like on Twitter 1640430514627551256 242 Twitter 1640430514627551256
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
12h

Oh fun.

‘AI is on the cusp of taking control: This is how it may all go wrong’

https://apple.news/AWvPXyT8WTVOs5byQvVk-3Q

Reply on Twitter 1640408084093779989 Retweet on Twitter 1640408084093779989 1 Like on Twitter 1640408084093779989 3 Twitter 1640408084093779989
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.