The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

The Canada Post Back-to-Work Legislation

by David Doorey June 20, 2011
written by David Doorey June 20, 2011

June 20, 2011

The Conservatives certainly have again been busy drafting restrictive labour legislation this week.  Earlier I discussed the  Bill that would have ordered an end to the Air Canada strike had the parties not reached agreement.  Today, the government introduced the legislation that would  order an end to the lockout at Canada Post.  It  is similar to the Air Canada Bill, but is even more detailed in its attempt to control the arbitrator’s discretion.  Here is Bill C-6.
Once again it gives the government (i.e. the Tories) the choice of arbitrators, and imposes Final Offer Selection, which means the arbitrator is limited to selecting either the union proposal or the employer proposal.  One party will “win” and one will “lose”, but in theory both will present proposals that could be accepted, which it is hoped will encourage proposals that are reasonably close to each other.  Unlike the Air Canada Bill, this legislation actually fixes the wages for the next and it imposes a term–the imposed collective agreement will expire on January 31, 2015.  The wage increases are fixed at:  1.75%, 1.5%, 2%, 2% annually, for the term of the agreement.  CUPW is saying that these amounts are less than what Canada Post had offered in bargaining, so that the government is taking the opportunity to pull back what was already on the table.
Section 11(2)  gives direction to the arbitrator:

In making the selection of a final offer, the arbitrator is to be guided by the need for terms and conditions of employment that are consistent with those in comparable postal industries and that will provide the necessary degree of flexibility to ensure the short- and long-term economic viability and competitiveness of the Canada Post Corporation, maintain the health and safety of its workers and ensure the sustainability of its pension plan, taking into account:
(a) that the solvency ratio of the pension plan must not decline as a direct result of the new collective agreement; and
(b) that the Canada Post Corporation must, without recourse to undue increases in postal rates, operate efficiently, improve productivity and meet acceptable standards of service.
Well, we certainly are micro-managing now.   What is a “comparable postal industry” to Canada Post, I wonder?  I presume that the reference to health and safety is a nod to the union’s claim that the employer is trying to impose conditions that are dangerous to workers, and the reference to flexibility and improving productivity without raising postal fees is a nod to the employer’s claims that it needs to compete in an increasingly competitive industry.
Presumably, the parties themselves will raise all of these issues in their submissions to the arbitrator, who obviously will consider them and then choose one or the other package.
Do you think that these parameters imposed on the arbitrator will effect the outcome in any way?
Do you think that this is just politics–a desire to create the impression that the government is directing outcomes?
I like the part about ordering the arbitrator to “ensure the viability of the pension plan”.  If the government knows how to ensure the viability of workers’ pension plans, then THAT would be a good use of legislation!
6 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Walmart Women Can't Bring Class Action for Sex Discrimination: U.S. Supreme Court
next post
School of HRM's Tony Fang Named President of Chinese Economists Society

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
1h

Every now and then I publish something in a different field just for fun.

My most cited papers are in #CSR, climate change, and supply chain management. Much larger audience for those than Canadian labour law, so they get way more citations.

Nothing to do with quality. 🤷

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @TheLawofWork

There’s many measures in academia that rank influence based on number of citations of academic articles.

Advice to new scholars:

If these rankings matter to you, do NOT focus your publications on Canadian labour & employment law. The potential audience is WAY too small!

Reply on Twitter 1623063845102055441 Retweet on Twitter 1623063845102055441 Like on Twitter 1623063845102055441 1 Twitter 1623063845102055441
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
1h

There’s many measures in academia that rank influence based on number of citations of academic articles.

Advice to new scholars:

If these rankings matter to you, do NOT focus your publications on Canadian labour & employment law. The potential audience is WAY too small!

Reply on Twitter 1623062714028290049 Retweet on Twitter 1623062714028290049 Like on Twitter 1623062714028290049 4 Twitter 1623062714028290049
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
5h

I use Steve Martin’s template for making a personal connection with his fans to make a personal connection with my students.

Reply on Twitter 1622997711287885824 Retweet on Twitter 1622997711287885824 5 Like on Twitter 1622997711287885824 51 Twitter 1622997711287885824
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.