Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Law of Work Archive

Teachers Boycott Volunteer Work: The Legal Issues

by David Doorey September 17, 2012
written by David Doorey September 17, 2012

NOTE:  This entry has received dozens of comments from teachers and others, for which I am thankful.  It is always good to hear from the people who are affected by the policies and laws we discuss in class.  I have posted most of the comments, though comments that were insulting or added nothing of value to the discussion were deleted.  I’m not the Toronto Sun. I’m moderating an educational website intended to engage and inform students.  I’ve now cut off comments, because the post is taking up too much space.  Thanks for your interest, and watch for future commentaries on this blog as legal issues relating to teachers’ collective bargaining as they emerge.   Best, David
I just returned from a visit to Northwestern University Law School in Chicago, where I several times found myself engulfed by thousands

In Illinois, teachers are on strike


of striking teachers.  Chicago teachers have been on strike for a week now, and yesterday members voted to continue the strike for a bit longer after rejecting a proposed settlement.  Here in Ontario, our Liberal government simply passed a law saying teachers can’t strike and fixing the collective agreement on terms the government wants.  Not often that we can say America has greater respect for workers’ collective bargaining rights, but here is one example.
Having had the right to strike taken from them, many teachers are now exercising the only tool left  (within the bounds of Canadian law) to express their frustration with their employer:  withdraw from performing volunteer work.  This includes after school coaching and mentoring.
This Toronto Star piece discusses how parents are having a hard time explaining to their children why the teachers aren’t doing this work. Wasn’t hard for me to explain it to my 9 year old:  Doing after school activities is not part of the teachers’ jobs, and they don’t get paid for it.  In Canada, luckily, no one can be forced to work for free. Your teachers volunteer to stay after work for free, because they care for you guys.  But right now they are mad at their employer, who they think is being mean and unfair to them.  The only way they can show their employer that they are mad is to stop volunteering to spend their free time at work. They are not mad at the kids. But sometimes in life you have to take a stand when you think someone is being mean to you.
Is it unlawful for the teachers to stop coaching football and dance class?  [Teachers should speak to their union before doing or not doing anything (This is NOT legal advice.  I am having a discussion with students about the law)]. Look at the definition of a strike in the Education Act:

(b) “strike” includes any action or activity by teachers in combination or in concert or in accordance with a common understanding that is designed or may reasonably be expected to have the effect of curtailing, restricting, limiting or interfering with,

(i) the normal activities of a board or its employees,  (ii) the operation or functioning of one or more of a board’s schools or of one or more of the programs in one or more schools of a board, or (iii)  the performance of the duties of teachers set out in the Act or the regulations under it, including any withdrawal of services or work to rule by teachers acting in combination or in concert or in accordance with a common understanding.

Should Volunteer Work Be Mandatory for Teachers?


Does this language make a refusal to coach a soccer team by teachers a strike?
If it does, then by virtue of Bill 115, a refusal to coach would be an unlawful strike right now.  But ‘work’ can’t include something that you are not required to do, right?  Imagine your employer asks you to volunteer at a charity event for 2 hours per day, after work.  Is that considered part of your job?  Should it be?  Does ‘normal activities of a board’s school or employees’ include volunteer work that a teacher would ‘normally’ offer to do for free?  If it does, then does that really mean that teachers can be ordered by the state to perform volunteer work?
In the past, there have been disputes about what teachers are and are  not required to do under their contracts.  For example, refusing to attend a staff meeting after school is probably refusing to ‘work’, because staff meetings are probably an expected requirement of teaching. But refusing to do pure volunteer work has not been found to be engaging in a strike.
There have also been attempts to legislate a broader definition a ‘strike’ for teachers in order to include extra-curricular activities like coaching.  For example, the Ontario Conservative government (surprise!), passed a law back in 2000 (Bill 80, if I recall correctly) to create a category of work called ‘co-instructional activities’, which included activities that ‘enrich pupil’s school-related activities’, including activities relating to ‘sports, arts, and cultural activities’.  Under that law, a refusal to perform volunteer after school coaching and mentoring work could have been treated as an unlawful strike.  That very controversial part of the law was never proclaimed into effect.

What do you think?  Should teachers be required by law to perform volunteer after school activities?  Should a refusal to volunteer be considered an unlawful strike?

If you were the state, would you attempt to pass a law banning teachers from refusing to volunteer?

If you think a law like that is a good idea, then should it apply beyond teachers?  Should all employees be required to perform volunteer work, or just teachers?

39 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is the Director of the School of HRM at York and Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and on the Advisory Board of the Osgoode Certificate program in Labour Law. He is a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program and a member of the International Advisory Committee on Harvard University’s Clean Slate Project, which is re-imaging labor law for the 21st century

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
Should Governments Forbid NHL Lockout?
next post
The Agenda Will Debate Conservative's Labour Law Reform Ideas this Wednesday Night

You may also like

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

A Successful Strike Vote is All That Stands...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Putin Invites Trump to Moscow for Second Meeting...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 225 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
17 Mar

New on @CanLawWorkForum from Prof David Doorey (@TheLawofWork)

#Uber #WorkerClassification #EmpLaw

David J. Doorey@TheLawofWork

Lots of chatter about Uber announcing it will kind of, sort of treat drivers as "workers" in the UK.

How does the UK's "worker" category compare to Canada's "dependent contractor" status? Some thoughts in my new post here on @CanLawWorkForum:

https://lawofwork.ca/uberworkerstatus/

Reply on Twitter 1372255751985631237Retweet on Twitter 13722557519856312371Like on Twitter 13722557519856312371Twitter 1372255751985631237
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
10 Mar

Good day to reflect back on this recent timely post explaining the PRO Act that would dramatically alter U.S. labor law.

For labor law students:

What changes in the PRO Act are already law in all or parts of Canada?

David J. Doorey@TheLawofWork

A primer for Canadians by ⁦@Harvard_Law⁩’s Jonathan Levitan on what is contained in the U.S. Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO Act) which recently passed in the House south of the border.

(From ⁦@CanLawWorkForum⁩) https://lawofwork.ca/amp/bidenagenda

Reply on Twitter 1369671304274608134Retweet on Twitter 13696713042746081341Like on Twitter 13696713042746081342Twitter 1369671304274608134
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
24 Feb

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211853Twitter 1364627677785821185
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.