Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
British ColumbiaCharter of Rights and FreedomsCOVID-19Employment RegulationHealth and SafetyUnions and Collective Bargaining

Could a Union-Led Work Stoppage to Combat COVID be Legal in Canada?

by Peter Cameron May 19, 2020
written by Peter Cameron May 19, 2020

Written by Peter Cameron

As COVID19 swept through Canadian meat and poultry processing plants, union leaders urged companies to close the worst-affected plants until employees could be tested, isolated if infected, and have their contacts traced; and until plants and processes could be modified to better protect employees. Sometimes employers did close plants, but often only after delays resulting in more infections. 

Is there more that unions themselves can do in these extreme circumstances?  In particular, can a union legally shutdown a facility where a pandemic is raging and where clearly its continued operation is a danger to the health and lives of the union’s members?

In most jurisdictions, individual workers have a right (and often a duty) to refuse unsafe work. For example, under BC’s Workers Compensation Act, “every worker must… take reasonable care to protect the worker’s health and safety and the health and safety of other persons who may be affected by the worker’s acts or omissions at work…”.  This appears to cover a worker’s refusal to work in circumstances where he or she is exposed to life-threatening illness.

Beyond the rights of workers as individuals, is there a collective right to refuse work?  Could the union legally initiate a full-scale work stoppage, involving all of its members at the workplace, in order to compel the employer to make changes necessary to protect the employees’ health?

Relative to the law in many other democracies, labour law in Canadian jurisdictions is very restrictive with respect to legally permissible strikes. The basic outline of our labour laws was established by a regulation (PC 1003) enacted during World War II, when uninterrupted production was paramount.  PC1003 barred strikes during the life of a collective agreement and, in exchange, the regulation provided unions and employees with the right to a process of binding arbitration to resolve mid-contract disputes. This key tradeoff was carried forward into federal and provincial labour laws after the war.

From labour’s perspective, this tradeoff has its limitations.  These are especially evident where arbitration is inherently unable to address an urgent problem in an effective and timely way.  Some jurisdictions (including BC) have exceptions to the prohibition against everymid-contract job action.  

Although BC has a typical (and typically broad) definition of ‘strike’ in its Labour Relations Code, another provision of the same Code provides an exception. The definition itself is comprehensive, including “a cessation of work, a refusal to work or to continue to work by employees in combination or in concert or in accordance with a common understanding, or a slowdown or other concerted activity on the part of employees that is designed to or does restrict or limit production or services…”.

However, the definition is subject to a later qualification in section 63 of the Code, which provides that any “act or omission by a trade union or by the employees does not constitute a strike if… it is required for the safety or health of those employees…“.

Putting the rule together with the exception results (at least arguably) in this: 

Even during the life of a collective agreement, a concerted activity of employees in accordance with a common understanding, designed to restrict production, is nota strike (and therefore is not contrary to the Code), provided that the activity is required for the safety or health of those employees.

In the case of a virus that is infecting an employers’ workforce, a dispute could arise with respect to the measures needed to protect the employees’ health, including a temporary plant closure.  This is a classic example of a dispute where arbitration cannot provide a timely remedy.  

In jurisdictions without the same kind of legislative provisions as BC, any purported illegality of job action during the life of a collective agreement, in circumstances where arbitration is clearly inadequate, may be open to a Charter challenge.

Before initiating a COVID-related work stoppage, it would be important for the union to make other attempts to persuade the employer to suspend its operations.  The union would also need to ensure that employee health is the real reason for the work stoppage, and that the health issue doesn’t get mingled with other differences the union may have with the employer. 

The above comments deal only with the question of legality.  The practical considerations facing union leaders in a specific case may be significant, and may weigh against a work stoppage. But, where inaction from the employer and government is endangering the lives of the union’s members, it can’t hurt the union’s cause to consider self-help.

Peter Cameron, “Could a Union-Led Work Stoppage to Combat COVID be Legal in Canada? ” Canadian Law of Work Forum (May 19 2020): https://lawofwork.ca/?p=12521

1 comment
2
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
Peter Cameron

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

1 comment

EMIL MESIC May 21, 2020 - 11:53 am

New and uncharted territory

Reply
previous post
The Future of Work: Integrating Bots and Humans in the Workforce
next post
Towards a “New Normal”: Labour Law Hearings Via Video-conference in the Era of COVID-19

You may also like

Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure...

February 24, 2021

The Striking Absence of Freedom of Association in...

February 19, 2021

Real Pleadings: Has Uber Created a New Service...

February 15, 2021

Flores v Scotlynn Sweetpac Growers Inc.: Migrant Workers...

February 3, 2021

Prof. Doorey’s Updated Beginners’ Guide to the Charter...

February 1, 2021

Calling the Shots: Is Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination a...

January 29, 2021

Does COVID Justify Longer Periods of Reasonable Notice?

January 25, 2021

Is “60 the New 50” in Assessing Length...

January 13, 2021

What is a Minority Union?

January 4, 2021

Canadian Bar Association Podcast: “After the Pandemic: Protecting...

December 17, 2020

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 218 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
16h

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211853Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
16h

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923168Like on Twitter 136462397617409231613Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
17h

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.