Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Law of Work Archive

Private Garbage Collectors in Windsor Heading for Unionization Vote

by David Doorey May 3, 2011
written by David Doorey May 3, 2011

The employees of Turtle Island, the private garbage collection company that won a 7 year  collection contract from the City of Windsor after a garbage strike are going to a certification vote this Thursday.  That would usually indicate that at least 40 percent of the 30 employees in Windsor have signed union membership cards.  If more than 50% vote in favour of unionization Thursday, Turtle Island will find itself in collective bargaining shortly thereafter.   Here is the Windsor Star story.
Turtle Island is often mentioned as the most likely candidate to win the Toronto bid, once the City farms out garbage collection here.  None of its employees have yet joined a union, but this could start the ball rolling if its successful.  I’ve wondered whether the Turtle Island employees enjoy being presented in the media all the time as the workers who will do this unpleasant work for cheaper, and for far fewer benefits than unionized garbage collectors.  Maybe the Windsor workers are looking for a better deal.
The Mayor did a TV interview about the certification drive. Watch it here. He alludes to a contract clause between the CIty and Turtle Island that would guarantee garbage pickup even if there was a strike.  I mentioned a while back that the City of Toronto was talking about inserting a clause in their tender contract that would require the private garbage collectors “post security bonds that they would forfeit in the event of a strike.”  I queried whether such a clause would be illegal.
I don’t know what the Windsor contract says.  I’d like to know though, so if you know, please send it along.   Whatever the contract says, it can’t prevent the Turtle Island employees from striking if they so choose.  That would be unlawful.   Perhaps it just  requires the garbage to be collected without interruption.  A strike or lockout could certainly interfere with that obligation.  Turtle Island would presumably need to use replacement workers to get the work done, which Ontario law permits.
Turtle Island managers are likely nervous about how the City of Windsor and Toronto will react to their employees unionizing.  Hopefully, that won’t cause them to suggest to the employees that their job security could be threatened by unionizing.  That would be unlawful, and possibly result in the union being certified by remedial order regardless of the vote outcome (see Section 11 of the LRA).   So far, there’s been no suggestion I’ve heard that Turtle Island has done anything unlawful.  Hopefully the vote will go smoothly on Thursday without any allegations of wrongdoing on either side.
Of course, there is no reason to believe that the Turtle Island employees will strike, even if they vote to unionize this week.  Strikes are rare in Canada, notwithstanding the sustained media attention public sector strikes attract when they do occur.   There is also the possibility of the union and Turtle Island agreeing to refer a bargaining dispute to interest arbitration if there is a real concern about the implications of a strike or lockout (See Section 40).  And you’d hope that an elected government would not cancel a contract simply because workers elected to exercise their legal right to unionize.  Especially in Windsor.

UPDATE:  Windsor’s Garbage Collectors Vote Against Unionization, 22 to 7.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is the Director of the School of HRM at York and Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and on the Advisory Board of the Osgoode Certificate program in Labour Law. He is a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program and a member of the International Advisory Committee on Harvard University’s Clean Slate Project, which is re-imaging labor law for the 21st century

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
Congrats to the Tories, NDP. Is Tory Majority "Undemocratic"?
next post
Guest Blog: Roy Adams on the Vast Potential of Ontario v. Fraser

You may also like

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

A Successful Strike Vote is All That Stands...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Putin Invites Trump to Moscow for Second Meeting...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 219 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
24 Feb

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211853Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
24 Feb

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923168Like on Twitter 136462397617409231613Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
24 Feb

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.