The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Ottawa Transit Union Rejects Employer's Offer in State-Ordered Vote

by David Doorey January 9, 2009
written by David Doorey January 9, 2009

Under no circumstances, can this be said to be a win for anyone, not the public, the city, or the union,' Mayor Larry O'Brien said yesterday of Ottawa's transit strike. He renewed his call for the union members to accept the city's latest offer, which they will vote on today.
I noted last week that the Federal government had exercised its right to order a vote on the employer’s last offer in the ongoing public transit strike in Ottawa.   That vote was held and the striking workers overwhelmingly rejected the offer, as this story in the Ottawa Citizen notes.  So the strike continues.
Michael Mac Neil, professor of labour law at Carelton, submitted the following useful comment on this situation to my entry yesterday about whether York should exercise its right to order a vote on its last offer (thanks Michael):

The Amalgamated Transit Union, represneting workers of OC Transpo in Ottawa, just voted yesterday on the employer’s final offer after the vote was ordered by the federal Labour Minister. The vote was 75% against accepting the offer. The ATU gave almost exactly the same reason [as is CUPE at York] for not putting the offer to its members – there was essentially no change in the offer from earlier employer offers. So it looks as if we are in for lots of winter walking here in Ottawa. The Canada Industrial Relations Board has also been asked to consider whether the strike poses a danger to health and safety. If the Board so decides, it can order that an appropriate level of services be resumed. The essential services provision in the Canada Labour Code is quite narrow, and allows intervention only with respect to danger to health and safety – no economic hardships to be taken into account. Furthermore, the danger must be serious and immediate. If the CIRB does not intervene, we may have a very long strike, unless Parliament decides to intervene once it is back in session.

In Ontario, “essential services” are dealt with in industry specific legislation, such as the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, s. 50 of which requires all bargaining disputes to go to binding arbitration (strikes are not permitted).   The Crown Employees Collective Bargaining Act covers public sector employers, and requires that an “essential services” agreement be bargained by the employer and the union that specifies which employees, and how many, are required to keep working to ensure that essential services are maintained during a strike.  Essential services is defined in s.  30):

“essential services” means services that are necessary to enable the employer to prevent,

(a) danger to life, health or safety,

(b) the destruction or serious deterioration of machinery, equipment or premises,

(c) serious environmental damage, or

(d) disruption of the administration of the courts or of legislative drafting;

Jonathan Eaton was written a very helpful paper explaining Ontario’s approach to essential services.  it should be clear from this very quick summary that university education does not fall within the meaning of “essential services”.  However, a government can still pass to back-to-work legislation, but I have heard no rumbling that the Liberal government is considering that in relation to the York strike.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
York Strike: On New Employer Offer, Is it Time for a Ratification Vote?
next post
York's Last Offer

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
4h

My fingers are just too big to play an A chord on the #guitar.

Otherwise I would be a rock star. This is the only thing holding me back.

Reply on Twitter 1623109078431027200 Retweet on Twitter 1623109078431027200 Like on Twitter 1623109078431027200 12 Twitter 1623109078431027200
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
4h

Not seen comparable stats for Canada.There are terminations, but also better laws in most Canadian jurisdictions, including

- remedial certification
- interim reinstatement
- card-check/quick votes

“1 in 5 workers in US is fired for organizing a union” https://onlabor.org/labor-law-reform-is-needed-for-unions-to-succeed/

Reply on Twitter 1623103873161330688 Retweet on Twitter 1623103873161330688 Like on Twitter 1623103873161330688 1 Twitter 1623103873161330688
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
4h

This is Canada's federal Minister of Labour.

Bill 377 was a labor bill disguised as a tax law (so Cons could pretend it was federal jurisdiction) that buried unions in red tape & reporting requirements not applicable to any other orgs.

https://www.parl.ca/Content/Bills/411/Private/C-377/C-377_3/C-377_3.PDF

Bill 525 ...

1/2

Seamus O'Regan Jr @SeamusORegan

Bills 377 and 525 were two of the most anti-worker, union-bashing bills this country has ever seen - put forward by the Harper Conservatives.

We scrapped them. We believe in unions. We believe in workers.

Reply on Twitter 1623097471407644673 Retweet on Twitter 1623097471407644673 10 Like on Twitter 1623097471407644673 33 Twitter 1623097471407644673
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.