The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Scholarship

Osgoode Law Student Wins Prize for Paper on Employment Law

by David Doorey March 30, 2011
written by David Doorey March 30, 2011

Ryan Edmonds, a student at Osgoode Hall Law School and Heenan Blaikie student (oh, and former research assistant for yours truly) has won second prize (and $1000) in the student essay writing competition at the Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies.  Congratulation to Ryan!
His paper is entitled “Taking the Risk Out of Termination: An Enterprise Risk Management Analysis of the Normative System of Employment Standards Abandoned by Honda v. Keays“.  It examines some issues that I too have considered, including how law and business risk interact to influence employer behaviour.  Here’s the abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Honda v. Keays. In particular, the paper considers the Court’s divestment from Wallace v. United Grain Growers, a case that transformed how non-unionized employees were thought of and treated in Canadian society. This paper examines that policy by discussing the analytical underpinnings of wrongful dismissal law’s previous bad faith damages regime and juxtaposes it to the new regime in Keays, concluding that the shift in focus from employer misconduct to employee loss exacerbates the employment relationship’s power imbalance and deprives employees of protection when it’s needed most. In reaching this conclusion, the paper uses the analytic frameworks of reflexive regulation and enterprise risk management to predict how employers will react to their new found advantage. The finding is that by taking the risk out of termination, there is now downward pressure to do away with the normative “upwardly ratcheting” system of employment standards that workplaces enjoyed under Wallace. The paper concludes by cautioning that subsuming all remedies related to the manner of dismissal – including tort causes of action – into the Keays/Hadley framework is a dangerous misstep that not only withholds recovery from seriously aggrieved employees, but also provides no countervailing incentive for employers to refine and improve their workplace standards.

It’s great to see a new generation of labour and employment law students doing interesting and thoughtful research.  Check out Ryan’s award-winning article at the link provided above.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Does Sears Have a Policy of Falsely Alleging Cause for Dismissal?
next post
The Annual "Sunshine List" Fuss

You may also like

Prof. Doorey’s Updated Beginners’ Guide to the Charter...

February 1, 2021

Webinar Video: The Future of Labor Law, with...

November 17, 2020

Disappointing Labour Law Reforms and What Unions Hold...

September 3, 2020

The Future of Work: Integrating Bots and Humans...

May 17, 2020

Improving protections for workers in precarious jobs: new...

April 17, 2020

Weekend Reading from Canadian Law of Work Forum

March 14, 2020

Can Transnational Labour Law Resolve the Crisis of...

March 12, 2020

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
josheidelson Josh Eidelson @josheidelson ·
5h

Scoop: Labor Board prosecutors have concluded Starbucks illegally refused to fairly negotiate at dozens of newly-unionized cafes across the country https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-28/starbucks-illegally-refused-to-bargain-on-zoom-nlrb-lawyer-says Starbucks’ refusal to negotiate if some workers participated via Zoom was illegal, NLRB general counsel says

Reply on Twitter 1640509028567506950 Retweet on Twitter 1640509028567506950 140 Like on Twitter 1640509028567506950 412 Twitter 1640509028567506950
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
alexisshotwell Alexis Shotwell @alexisshotwell ·
10h

This morning the president of @Carleton_U sent out a note underlining his understanding of “how painful labour disruptions can be to communities,” pleading for us to be calm and respectful and to support our students at the end of term. 1/

Reply on Twitter 1640430514627551256 Retweet on Twitter 1640430514627551256 84 Like on Twitter 1640430514627551256 242 Twitter 1640430514627551256
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
12h

Oh fun.

‘AI is on the cusp of taking control: This is how it may all go wrong’

https://apple.news/AWvPXyT8WTVOs5byQvVk-3Q

Reply on Twitter 1640408084093779989 Retweet on Twitter 1640408084093779989 1 Like on Twitter 1640408084093779989 3 Twitter 1640408084093779989
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.