The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Arbitrator Won't be "Minion of Government", Awards Profs a Raise

by David Doorey October 13, 2010
written by David Doorey October 13, 2010

The Ontario government passed a law recently called the Public Sector Compensation Restrain to Protect Public Services Act, 2010.  That legislation froze wages of nonunion employees of the government for the period March 2010 to April 2012.  But it does not apply to unionized employees covered by collective agreements.  That is obviously unfair to the nonunion employees and no doubt pisses them off.   On the governments Q&A page, the government explains why the law applies only to nonunionized employees as follows:

Employees who are part of a union or who bargain compensation collectively would see their current agreements honoured.  When these agreements expire and new contracts are negotiated, the government will work with transfer payment partners and bargaining agents to seek agreements of at least two years’ duration that do not include net compensation increases.  The fiscal plan provides no funding for compensation increases for future collective agreements.   It doesn’t matter whether contracts expire next month, next year or the year after that – all employers and employee groups will be expected to do their part.

So, in other words, the government is “asking” unionized employees to just accept the same wage freeze voluntarily, but under the threat that the government will not fund any wage increase.  That strategy is having little effect on the behaviour of interest arbitrators or unions.  I mentioned an award a while back involving nurses that rejected the employer’s claim that wages should be frozen.
Now arbitrator Martin Teplitsky has ordered a wage increase of about 2.3% for two years for U. of Toronto professors, which is based on the rate tepof wage increases in the private sector (so all those anti-public sector workers out there shouldn’t be complaining that public sector workers are getting special treatment).    Here is the arbitration award.
Teplitsky wrote that he would not be  a “minion of government”, and that public sector workers should not be asked to shoulder any more of the pain of a large budget deficit than other Ontarians:

It is plain that what drives the Government’s legislation and policy is its legitimate concerns about the huge provincial deficit and its impact on the Government’s ability to provide services.  Obviously “0%” public sector increases make funding of services easier… This is a clear case of either requiring or asking public sector employees to subsidize the public because public services benefit the public as a whole.  A more equitable approach to protect these services would be to spread the ‘pain’ by measures which increase revenues (more taxes or user fees) although I recognize that such measures would be less popular than the one adopted by the government.

The University must have known that its argument that unionized employee wages should be frozen because the government would like that had no chance with Arbitrator Teplitsky.   Teplitsky has long been on the record with his view that arbitrators should not accept public sector employer wage freezes just because that would make life easier for politicians.  As I noted in my earlier post, Teplitsky has said that, in the public sector, it is never about “inability to pay”, it is about unwillingness to pay.
What do you think about the argument that public sector workers should not be expected to fund the provincial deficit through wage freezes?

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Canada Ranks 20th in World in Gender Wage Equality
next post
Osgoode's LLM in Labour & Employment Law Begins Tonight!

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
9h

Interested in your comment that you don’t have rules. I’d think that submitting an essay written by a machine without citing the machine is just straight up plagiarism.

My view is that any text not written by yourself needs to be fully cited.

Andres Guadamuz @technollama

@shahaoul @glynmoody Indeed. As we don't have rules, we can only mark what's in front of us. I can imagine some students using it judiciously, to get a technical definition for example, but in other cases the result can be an incoherent unstructured essay. So we mark it as that.

Reply on Twitter 1619691956413808640 Retweet on Twitter 1619691956413808640 2 Like on Twitter 1619691956413808640 23 Twitter 1619691956413808640
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
19h

McDonald's president who made $7.4 million last year says proposal to pay fast-food workers $22 an hour is 'costly and job-destroying' https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/mcdonalds-president-who-made-dollar74-million-last-year-says-proposal-to-pay-fast-food-workers-dollar22-an-hour-is-costly-and-job-destroying/ar-AA16Mc7D?ocid=a2hs&li=BBnb7Kz

Reply on Twitter 1619548631421562880 Retweet on Twitter 1619548631421562880 17 Like on Twitter 1619548631421562880 47 Twitter 1619548631421562880
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
19h

Google axes thousands of jobs while rolling in cash on orders from Wall Street pencil pushers. Pretty obvious where public anger should be directed.

https://www.thestar.com/business/opinion/2023/01/28/dont-do-evil-massive-layoffs-at-google-shine-a-light-on-tech-giants-ugly-side.html

Reply on Twitter 1619544883609407488 Retweet on Twitter 1619544883609407488 7 Like on Twitter 1619544883609407488 9 Twitter 1619544883609407488
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.