The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

It's the Unions, Stupid! …

by David Doorey November 26, 2008
written by David Doorey November 26, 2008

I read the National Post today while riding my exercise bike through my virtual Wii world.  It made me laugh out loud (the Post, not the Wii world, which is actually pretty cool).
The Post today had no less than three anti-union rants!  On page A16, Mathieu Roy called unions “parasites of Western societies”.  Ouch.  On page A17, Paul Andrews blamed the downfall of the Big Three auto manufacturers on unions.  He wrote: “The legacy costs associated with inflated union wages and pensions are the reason that the Big Three are not profitable.”   [I’m not sure that argument is very convincing.  Perhaps the fact that the companies continued to produce gas-guzzling SUVs that no one wants anymore, while paying their executives hundreds of millions of dollars for making those kinds of decisions might have something to do with it. Check out an alternative opinion by Harvard economist Richard Freemman here] .  Then on p. FP15, Ray Pennings blamed construction unions and labour laws in Ontario for discouraging innovation in the Ontario construction industry.  I’m not sure if he means the innovation of the construction workers, or the developers, or someone else.
So, unions are evil and the cause of most economic problems.  We’ve heard all this before from the National Post, so that’s not what is funny.  As Elaine and Jerry would say, yada, yada, yada.  What I found funny was the juxtaposition of  these arguments against unions with the article by employment lawyer Howard Levitt on page WK1.  Levitt was advising employers on the best way to layoff non-union workers in these difficult times.  His advice, summarized was this:

Don’t be generous.  Pay people less notice pay than they are actually legally entitled to.  If an employee sues to recover what they are legally entitled to, hire him (or some other lawyer who is “not anxious to settle”) to fight hard in order to send a message to other employees that they are in for a fight if they have the gall to demand what they are legally entitled to.  And, for God’s sake, don’t offer to pay the employee’s lawyer’s excessive costs if you settle the case later.   That way, the employee may actually be financially punished for trying to press for the severance they were legally entitled to.

Come on, you have to admit that’s funny.   The inference in the first three opinions was that workers (and society generally) would be better off without unions, presumably because unions are not needed to protect workers.  The Levitt piece then demonstrates that, without unions, employers can dismiss employees without actually paying them what they are legally entitled to, because few non-union employees have the resources to take on their employer in court.  Mr. Levitt’s advice is to treat employees unfairly (by giving them less than what a court would order the employer to pay), and dare them to file a lawsuit!
Don’t forget that the people the employer terminates are usually friends with the people who remain employees.  Studies show that important reasons why people join unions are for better job security and because they perceive management is treating workers unfairly.   So, if you are an HR manager, a good way to get the remaining employees to consider a union is to be a prick to the employees you do layoff.  That’s also a good way to acquire a reputation as an unfair employer.  But, as Mr. Levitt notes, it might save you a few bucks, as long as the legal fees aren’t more than the cost of simply paying the employee the proper notice pay in the first place.
I laughed all the way to the finish line (where I won access to a new Yoga move!)

3 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
As predicted, Osgoode's Back!
next post
The Strike Continues … Mostly

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 334 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
2h

A wife AND a childcare worker in my case of a PHD and 2 kids, etc, since the wife has a high stress job.

dr caitlin green (offense archaologist)@caitlinmoriah

the secret is a wife. it’s always a wife. https://twitter.com/peaktobi/status/1539234970157432832

Reply on Twitter 1539741811035590657Retweet on Twitter 1539741811035590657Like on Twitter 1539741811035590657Twitter 1539741811035590657
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
2h

When I was a junior lawyer in British Columbia in 1990s, I did cases in BC, other western provinces.

Opposing counsel would often introduce me to arbitrator, “Have you met Mr Doorey, he’s from Toronto”

At first I thought ‘very polite’. Soon realized I was being “othered”!

Reply on Twitter 1539735535283052545Retweet on Twitter 15397355352830525451Like on Twitter 15397355352830525459Twitter 1539735535283052545
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
3h

Implications for US Labor Law, anyone?

Julia Bacha@juliabacha

Breaking news: The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today that boycotts are not protected by the First Amendment. @ACLU has confirmed it'll take the case to the Supreme Court, with huge implications for free speech in America.🧵

Reply on Twitter 1539725319103549441Retweet on Twitter 1539725319103549441Like on Twitter 15397253191035494411Twitter 1539725319103549441
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.