The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

City of Toronto Violates ESA, Ordered to Pay Employees $5 Million in Back Wages

by David Doorey April 5, 2011
written by David Doorey April 5, 2011

Politicians these days like to make big promises to cut public sector pay.  It’s politically popular to cast all public sector workers as lazy, overpaid deadweight.   In Toronto, a Mayor got elected in no small measure because of his promise to attack City employees.  Often this narrative is directed at the governments’ unionized workers, but nonunion workers are not exempt.   In 2009, the City of Toronto council (under Mayor Miller) decided they would prefer not to pay some $5 million in  annual bonuses required by the employment contracts of its nonunion, managerial employees.  So the Council canceled the payments.  The employees filed an employment standards complaint.  The employees won, and now the City needs to pay the bonuses.  Here is a Toronto Star piece discussing the decision.
Here is the Employment Standards Officer’s decision
The key to the decision is the fact that “wages” (section 1 definitions) in the Employment Standards Act includes any “monetary remuneration payable by an employer to an employee under the terms of an employment contract, oral or written, express or implied”. In other words, a term of the employment contract requiring payment of a bonus becomes enforceable under the ESA, since Section 11 requires employers to pay “all wages” to employees.
The manager’s contracts included a requirement for the employer to pay a performance bonus of up to 3% for 2008 if employees met some benchmark performance standards for the year, subject to the City approving the budget for that year the bonuses would be paid (2009).  In this case, the employees earned the bonuses for the year 2008, and the Council approved the 2009 budget in March 2009.  Thus, the preconditions in the employment contract for payment of the bonus were satisfied, and the bonuses became due.  The attempt by the City to later (in April 2009) rescind the bonuses was illegal and a breach of the employment contract and the ESA.
In the Star piece, Councillor Peter Milczyn is quoted as follows:  “It was removed after they had earned it, and we knew at the time that it was a problematic decision.”  If the employer knew the decision to cancel the bonuses was problematic, why did they go through with it?  Politics, I presume.  Miller was trying to look like he was taking action on public sector wages, and the decision did manage to defer these costs til now.
Mayor Ford, for all his whining about overpaid City employees, has approved a 2.25% raise for these same managerial employees.  There’s no great secret  why Ford and his gravy-cutting buds on Council are now sucking up to the nonunion City employees.  Next year, when Ford locks out garbage collectors,  child car workers, and other city administrators, guess who will be expected to work ridiculously long hours picking up the slack and answering angry phone calls for “taxpayers”?  You got it:  the nonunion managers.
What do you think employee morale is like at  the City these days?

1 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
The Annual "Sunshine List" Fuss
next post
Do Corporate Tax Cuts Create Jobs?

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
josheidelson Josh Eidelson @josheidelson ·
6h

Scoop: Labor Board prosecutors have concluded Starbucks illegally refused to fairly negotiate at dozens of newly-unionized cafes across the country https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-28/starbucks-illegally-refused-to-bargain-on-zoom-nlrb-lawyer-says Starbucks’ refusal to negotiate if some workers participated via Zoom was illegal, NLRB general counsel says

Reply on Twitter 1640509028567506950 Retweet on Twitter 1640509028567506950 145 Like on Twitter 1640509028567506950 429 Twitter 1640509028567506950
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
alexisshotwell Alexis Shotwell @alexisshotwell ·
11h

This morning the president of @Carleton_U sent out a note underlining his understanding of “how painful labour disruptions can be to communities,” pleading for us to be calm and respectful and to support our students at the end of term. 1/

Reply on Twitter 1640430514627551256 Retweet on Twitter 1640430514627551256 86 Like on Twitter 1640430514627551256 245 Twitter 1640430514627551256
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
13h

Oh fun.

‘AI is on the cusp of taking control: This is how it may all go wrong’

https://apple.news/AWvPXyT8WTVOs5byQvVk-3Q

Reply on Twitter 1640408084093779989 Retweet on Twitter 1640408084093779989 1 Like on Twitter 1640408084093779989 3 Twitter 1640408084093779989
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.