The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Can City of Toronto Fine Private Garbage Collectors Whose Employees' Strike

by David Doorey November 29, 2010
written by David Doorey November 29, 2010

Although the media weren’t much interested in the issue during the election campaign, suddenly, now that Mayor Ford has been elected, my earlier blog posts discussing the legal difficulties the City will face when trying to contract out garbage collection are being noted.  A couple of weeks ago, editor Rob Granatstein at the Toronto Sun linked to my blog, and today a former Toronto Star city bureau reporter (Alan Christie) did the same on the news website Open File.
Comments from Doug Holyday, the new deputy mayor, in Christie’s piece are very interesting.  Here is what Holyday told Christie:

the city would force private contractors to post security bonds that they would forfeit in the event of a strike.

See, I told you it was going to be fun have Mayor Ford as Mayor.  So, here’s a question.  Can a government include in a commercial contract a clause that punishes a contractor if its’ employees exercise the legal right to strike?  I’d assume too that any such clause would have a similar punishment for a lockout of employees, since the result to the City would be same in either case.  In essence, Holyday seems to be proposing that the City would fine contractors whose employees strike or are locked out.
Note first that even if such a clause is lawful, it wouldn’t stop the contractors’ employees from striking or the contractor from locking out the employees.  It would just require the contractor to pay the city money if that happens.  It would punish the contractor if their is a lawful (or unlawful) work stoppage.
There is no doubt that it would be illegal for the contractor to make it a condition of employment that its employees not strike.  That would violate Section 70, 72, and probably 76 of the Labour Relations Act.  Probably the contractor wouldn’t be so explicit though.  More likely, the contractor would tell its employees that if they strike, the contractor will be fined by the City, and the fine could threaten the viability of the contract and possibly the contractor, and consequently the employees’ jobs.  The  contractor would probably want the employees to think that there could serious business serious implications to the employer if the employees exercise their legal right to strike.
If the contractor told them they could lose contracts if the workers unionized, would that be illegal?  Well, if it played out as I’ve described, probably so.  It would amount to the employer saying that if the employees exercise their statutory right to unionize or strike, they could lose their jobs.  Isn’t that a threat intended to compel an employee to refrain from joining a union or striking?
Is it a violation of the Labour Relations Act for an employer to agree with the City that it will pay a fine if employees strike or if locks out its employees?  That’s a good question.  Look at section 76.  Is it a coercive clause that would tend to dissuade either the contractor from locking out workers or the employees from striking?   What do you think?
Here’s another question.  Should a contract clause fining a contractor if its employees engage in a legal strike be struck down as contrary to public policy?  Courts have struck down clauses that that interfere with the administration of justice because the are contrary to sound public policy.  If the clause purported to impose a financial penalty on the contractor if it locks out its employees, for example, what we would have is a contract term that would seek to restrain the exercise of a legal right by imposition of a financial penalty.  How do you think a court would respond to such a clause imposed by a government?
I just might have to write a legal paper on this one to tell the legal world what our Mayor’s office is up to if the City were to follow through with Holyday’s suggestion.   This is so much fun already!

2 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Roy Adams on the Fraser Case and the Recent ILO Decision Finding Against the Province of Ontario
next post
Did Mayor Ford's Office Violate the Employment Standards Act

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
4h

My fingers are just too big to play an A chord on the #guitar.

Otherwise I would be a rock star. This is the only thing holding me back.

Reply on Twitter 1623109078431027200 Retweet on Twitter 1623109078431027200 Like on Twitter 1623109078431027200 12 Twitter 1623109078431027200
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
4h

Not seen comparable stats for Canada.There are terminations, but also better laws in most Canadian jurisdictions, including

- remedial certification
- interim reinstatement
- card-check/quick votes

“1 in 5 workers in US is fired for organizing a union” https://onlabor.org/labor-law-reform-is-needed-for-unions-to-succeed/

Reply on Twitter 1623103873161330688 Retweet on Twitter 1623103873161330688 Like on Twitter 1623103873161330688 1 Twitter 1623103873161330688
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
4h

This is Canada's federal Minister of Labour.

Bill 377 was a labor bill disguised as a tax law (so Cons could pretend it was federal jurisdiction) that buried unions in red tape & reporting requirements not applicable to any other orgs.

https://www.parl.ca/Content/Bills/411/Private/C-377/C-377_3/C-377_3.PDF

Bill 525 ...

1/2

Seamus O'Regan Jr @SeamusORegan

Bills 377 and 525 were two of the most anti-worker, union-bashing bills this country has ever seen - put forward by the Harper Conservatives.

We scrapped them. We believe in unions. We believe in workers.

Reply on Twitter 1623097471407644673 Retweet on Twitter 1623097471407644673 10 Like on Twitter 1623097471407644673 33 Twitter 1623097471407644673
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.