The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Blakes on List of Most Diverse Employers. Huh?

by David Doorey March 26, 2010
written by David Doorey March 26, 2010

Did you catch the piece in the Globe and Mail this week about the 45 Top Diversity-Focused Canadian employers?
The Toronto law firm Blake Cassels Graydon is on the list.  I almost choked on my Cheerios. Seriously, folks.  Is there any place less diverse than Bay Street law firms?  The fact that any Bay Street law firm makes such a list has to raise serious doubts about the methodology and usefulness of this kind of survey, and undermines the real successes of other companies who actually have a diverse workplace.  Of course, Blakes is now using its inclusion on the list in its promotional material.  Why does Blakes make this list?  Well, we are told this:

Recently launched a diversity and equity intranet site to educate employees about the firm’s diversity achievements and related events.

Oh, well then, that explains everything.  Kind of like saying, Wal-Mart is a great employer because it posts a code of conduct on its website that explains its commitment to strong labour practices.
There is an accompanying piece on Blakes in the same Globe section. In it, we learn that “only around 25 percent of partners” at Blakes are women.  There’s no mention of what percentage are non-white, or gay or lesbian, but does anyone want to hazard a guess?  The main evidence that Blakes is a Top Diversity-Focused employer, other than having a fancy website saying they are, is that they allow women to work three or four days a week after they have babies.  I have several friends who did this at their Bay Street firms.  What everyone I have spoken to tells me is that this arrangement often means you work 50 hours a week instead of 80, and receive 60 or 80 percent of your regular income.  Maybe its different at Blakes (but I have my doubts).
I’m not harping on Blakes.  The other big firms aren’t any better as far as I have seen, and some are no doubt worse.   But if you are going to put a law firm on a diversity list, how ’bout one that actually has some diversity?
It would be impossible, I think, to find a medium to large firm in Canada that is strongly represented in terms of visible minorities at this stage. Even at law schools, the student body remains largely white, although there have been some improvements in that area.  It will be decades or generations before there is real diversity in big law firms.  However, there are decent sized law firms in Toronto that have gender diversity.  For example, look at Cavalluzzo Hayes, a leading labour and employment law firm.  By my quick count of bios on their website, there are MORE female than male partners (13 female to 10 males).  Which raises the question:  How did the survey makers end up looking at Blakes and not a firm like Cavalluzzo?
What do you think?  Should Bay Street law firms like Blakes be  put onto Best Diversity lists when their diversity numbers are so dismal?

2 comments
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Eric Tucker on Renorming Labour Law
next post
The Morley Gunderson Prize in Industrial Relations

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
1h

FYI, the School of HRM at @yorkuniversity will be hiring up to 2 tenure-stream profs including possibly one at the Associate Professor level.

Jobs will be posted in fall for start July 1, 2023. If you know anyone in the market pass along.

https://www.yorku.ca/laps/shrm/

Reply on Twitter 1558834355442552832Retweet on Twitter 15588343554425528321Like on Twitter 15588343554425528321Twitter 1558834355442552832
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
15h

If one these dimwits was a Sacha Baron Cohen-like comedian playing the role of a Republican would any one notice?

PatriotTakes 🇺🇸@patriottakes

Marjorie Taylor Greene believes generating electricity from “wind turbines and solar panels” will result in the loss of air conditioning and home appliances.

Greene: “I like the lights on. I want to stay up later at night. I don’t want to have to go to bed when the sun sets.”

Reply on Twitter 1558630572783722497Retweet on Twitter 15586305727837224972Like on Twitter 15586305727837224974Twitter 1558630572783722497
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
17h

A student told me she is translating chapters of my book into Korean because she learned a lot and wants it as a reference but English is her second language.

Any Korean speakers out there? What does this say?

일의 법칙

Reply on Twitter 1558595466182393858Retweet on Twitter 1558595466182393858Like on Twitter 15585954661823938582Twitter 1558595466182393858
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.