The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Collective BargainingLabour ArbitrationSports LabourUnions and Collective BargainingUnited States

Trevor Bauer Suspension: Professional Sport as a Lens for Studying Labour-Management Relations

by Brad Walchuk May 3, 2022
written by Brad Walchuk May 3, 2022

Written by Brad Walchuk, Staff Rep, CUPE, Local 3906 and Adjunct Professor, Brock University

The study of labour relations in professional sports is an effective lens into the broader study of labour-management relations. Free agency, trades, concussions, injuries, and suspensions are essentially workplace issues. Due to the popularity of professional sports, these issues are far more public than similar and more frequently occurring issues in more traditional workplaces

On April 29, Major League Baseball announced that it had suspended Los Angeles Dodgers pitcher Trevor Bauer for two full seasons (324 games plus playoffs) under the Major League Baseball-Major League Baseball Players’ Association Joint Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Child Abuse Policy (‘Policy’). Bauer has announced that he will be appealing the suspension. In doing so, he becomes the first player to appeal a suspension under the Policy. The 324 games – which will be unpaid – are in addition to the 99 regular-season games that Bauer already missed since being placed on paid administrative leave in July 2021.

The suspension is notable for a number of reasons. It is the longest suspension in the history of the Policy and the first suspension that will be appealed. The previous longest suspension under the Policy involved pitcher Sam Dyson, who was suspended for one full season (162 games) in 2021. Bauer is also a marquee player in MLB, having won the National League Cy Young Award (for best pitcher) in 2020. He then signed a three-year, $102 million free agent contract. Bauer’s suspension has already created considerable buzzin the sports world, and will also have major ramifications on Bauer. Veteran baseball writer Bob Nightengale notes that Bauer “may never put on a major league uniform again,” adding, “this suspension is really a baseball death sentence.” The suspension also provides an opportunity to engage in a broader discussion of labour-management relations.

Bauer was originally placed on leave in July 2021 after allegations of graphic domestic violence and sexual assault became public when a woman claimed that “Bauer assaulted her during two consensual sexual encounters that turned violent, resulting in head and facial trauma” and that he “strangled her to the point that she lost consciousness and punched her multiple times in the face.” In February 2022, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office elected not to charge Bauer criminally, arguing it was “unable to prove the relevant charges beyond a reasonable doubt.”

While the District Attorney was conducting a criminal investigation, MLB was simultaneously undertaking its own employer-led investigation to determine if Bauer violated the league’s domestic violence policy. Under the terms of the Policy, a player can be suspended for a violation, even if they have not been charged with, or convicted of, a criminal offense. That Bauer can face a suspension of two years and lose $60 million in salary in the absence of a criminal charge or conviction illustrates an important reality of the employment relationship – the power of workplace policies, even in a unionized workplace.

In matters of employment disputes, there is a lower standard of proof than in criminal proceedings. In criminal proceedings, the standard is proof ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’. In contrast, in the realm of labour relations, the standard of proof is a ‘balance of probabilities.’ This means that something was more likely than not to have occurred. In Bauer’s case, the District Attorney felt it was unable to prove any possible charges under that higher legal standard.

Employers are not bound by this higher legal standard. What the law prohibits and classifies as a crime is far narrower than what workplace policies prohibit and classify as a violation. As Nightengale noted, “we don’t know…what MLB found in its investigation since the results were not released,” but rightly adds, “considering the length of the suspension, they must have been damning.”

In this instance, the Policy itself makes clear that the Commissioner can unilaterally suspend a player, even in the absence of a charge or conviction. This is also a joint policy that the union and employer have agreed to. In other words, the union has consented to the employer having this power to enforce the policy through suspension. This will make it harder for an arbitrator to find Bauer’s suspension to be unreasonable and to overturn the discipline.

A joint policy between the union and the employer is rare; employers unilaterally impose most workplace policies. Even if this were not a joint policy, there is a very good chance of an arbitrator finding the suspension to be reasonable. Employers can generally impose policies to the degree that they do not interfere with provisions contained within a collective agreement (or that interfere with the legislative rights held by employees). Such policies – subject to certain conditions – fall within the realm of a ‘management rights’ clause.

In Canada, an employer’s ability to impose workplace policies are subject to the ‘KVP test’, or “an arbitral doctrine that holds employer rules to a standard of reasonableness.”  The principles contained within the KVP test – stemming from a 1965 arbitration ruling – were endorsed by the Supreme Court of Canada as a proper standard of reasonableness. The test, which will not apply in Bauer’s case, has six aspects. The employer’s actions must be: consistent with the collective agreement; reasonable; clear and unequivocal; brought to the attention of the employees affected before the employer attempts to act on it; enforced consistently since its introduction; and, where the rule is invoked to justify discharge, the employee was notified that a breach of the rule could result in discharge. Employer policies can regulate behavior on the worksite or off it. Employer policies can regulate behavior on the worksite or off it provided the rules it adopts satisfy the KVP test.

An important question that will emerge in Bauer’s appeal is the degree to which MLB can regulate how players behave outside of the workplace, and particularly ‘in the bedroom.’ Bauer’s suspension illustrates that simply because the state is unable (or unwilling) to prosecute does not mean that the employer cannot act. Whether Bauer is successful in his appeal or not, Major League Baseball has taken a much-needed step to penalize those who violate the Joint Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Child Abuse Policy. Whatever the outcome of that appeal – and we can save that for another blog post – MLB has taken its boldest stance against domestic violence and sexual assault.

Brad Walchuk works for a public sector union in Hamilton, Ontario. He is also employed as a part-time instructor in the Department of Labour Studies at Brock University where, among other things, he teaches a course on labour relations in professional sports. His opinions are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer(s).

0 comment
2
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
Brad Walchuk

previous post
How Canadian Unions Responded to Vaccine Mandates, Protests, and Blockades
next post
Why It’s So Hard to Unionize Starbucks in Canada

You may also like

What Might a Right to Strike for Non-Union...

December 16, 2022

Lessons for the Railway Showdown from a Victory...

November 30, 2022

Court Strikes Down Ontario’s Punitive Public Sector Wage...

November 29, 2022

New Video: Standing Up to the Notwithstanding Clause

November 25, 2022

On the Right to Strike in Canada and...

November 1, 2022

UPDATE: Ontario Invokes Notwithstanding Clause, Crushes Labour Rights...

October 31, 2022

R.O. MacDowell: Who Defines Appropriate Bargaining Units After...

October 10, 2022

(Video) Professor Doorey on ‘Micro Labour Law’ Below...

October 6, 2022

Right of B.C. Workers to Refuse to Cross...

September 26, 2022

CUPW’s Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Against Uber Raises...

September 16, 2022

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
9h

Interested in your comment that you don’t have rules. I’d think that submitting an essay written by a machine without citing the machine is just straight up plagiarism.

My view is that any text not written by yourself needs to be fully cited.

Andres Guadamuz @technollama

@shahaoul @glynmoody Indeed. As we don't have rules, we can only mark what's in front of us. I can imagine some students using it judiciously, to get a technical definition for example, but in other cases the result can be an incoherent unstructured essay. So we mark it as that.

Reply on Twitter 1619691956413808640 Retweet on Twitter 1619691956413808640 2 Like on Twitter 1619691956413808640 23 Twitter 1619691956413808640
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
19h

McDonald's president who made $7.4 million last year says proposal to pay fast-food workers $22 an hour is 'costly and job-destroying' https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/mcdonalds-president-who-made-dollar74-million-last-year-says-proposal-to-pay-fast-food-workers-dollar22-an-hour-is-costly-and-job-destroying/ar-AA16Mc7D?ocid=a2hs&li=BBnb7Kz

Reply on Twitter 1619548631421562880 Retweet on Twitter 1619548631421562880 17 Like on Twitter 1619548631421562880 47 Twitter 1619548631421562880
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
19h

Google axes thousands of jobs while rolling in cash on orders from Wall Street pencil pushers. Pretty obvious where public anger should be directed.

https://www.thestar.com/business/opinion/2023/01/28/dont-do-evil-massive-layoffs-at-google-shine-a-light-on-tech-giants-ugly-side.html

Reply on Twitter 1619544883609407488 Retweet on Twitter 1619544883609407488 7 Like on Twitter 1619544883609407488 9 Twitter 1619544883609407488
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.