Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
COVID-19Employment RegulationQuebecStudent Post

Artists are Screwed in the Covid-19 Era: What implications for labour policies?

by Laurence Dubuc April 27, 2020
written by Laurence Dubuc April 27, 2020

Written by Laurence D. Dubuc, PhD Candidate, University of Montreal

Who has not come across a social media post stating something similar to the following at least once in the last weeks? “If you think art and artists are useless, try spending your lockdown without movies, books, poems and paintings.”

The Great Lockdown has brought the most privileged of us to increase our cultural consumption levels in a significant way. At the same time, the arts and culture sector is amongst the hardest hit by Covid-19. Artists and cultural organizations have witnessed the gradual closing of music venues and art institutions, the cancellation of openings, events, festivals, concerts, filmings. The government’s attempts to restrain the virus and keep the population safe has led to their contracts and opportunities disappearing one after the other. 

Obviously artists do not have a monopoly of Covid-19-induced precarity in terms of work and employment. Everyone, every type of company and every sector, is affected in some ways. Salaried and hourly workers have experienced lay offs or reductions of their work load and income across the country. However independent contractors—or the self-employed—occupy a particularly precarious position. In its current state, Canadian labour policies fail to protect workers working engaged under “atypical” arrangements, a term that has long been losing its relevance in the course of capitalism’s evolution. The social and economic crisis provoked by Covid-19 has proven that our national social protection system is unsuitable for a lot of workers, especially self-employed ones. It has also disclosed major deficiencies affecting artists specifically because of the sector’s dependency on public support.   

According to a recent Hill Strategies report[1], 52% of Canadian artists were self-employed in 2016 compared to only 12% of the general population. As independent contractors, artists are excluded from most of the legal protections available to employees, which were initially designed to redress concerns with the standard employment model. Because artists are known to be multiple-job holders, many studies across industrialized countries have investigated their income distribution between arts and non-arts activities. In Quebec, we know for example that the arts-derived income of professional visual artists[2] and dancers[3] is so low that holding multiple jobs appears to be for most artists a necessity in order to survive. Even when they cumulate their independent contractor status with a salaried status in another job, a lot of artists do not meet the requirements to benefit from the protection of the Employment Insurance Act. 

When Covid-19 reached Canada and Quebec, it became clear that temporary social protection programs would be needed to ensure all workers could have their most basic needs met. In Quebec, the Temporary Aid for Workers Program (PATT) was put in place to temporarily support workers ineligible for EI while they waited for the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) to open on April the 6th. A preliminary report[4] published on April 13th by the Canadian Arts Council showed that 43% of the 7 500 participating artists and cultural organizations had applied to the CERB. Of the remaining 57%, 35% said they did not need it, while 36% said they did not think they were eligible, 21% gave other reasons, and 7% said they were lacking information. As with many other self-employed workers, artists can be unfamiliar or intimidated by the technicalities of policies from which they are usually excluded. For instance, they need to know that that the CERB is a taxable benefit and that they should set aside some money – now or later – for next year’s income tax season. Also, since CERB, just like EI, is a temporary income replacement program, artists who benefit from it already need to think about securing contracts and other opportunities for the fall right now. 

The Covid-19 crisis is also exacerbated in the arts and culture sector because of the fact that apart from the rare larger profitable cultural organizations, the smaller not-for-profits (NFPs) are dependent upon the state for their survival. These latter organizations play a vital role in the federal, provincial, regional and local cultural ecosystems. They not only provide work opportunities to an important number of artists across Canada but they also work to shield artists and cultural workers from some market pressures. As the Canadian Arts Council report showed, 41% of participating cultural organizations had applied to the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) which provides a wage subsidy of up to 75% to eligible employers for a period of up to 12 weeks. The same report showed that 7% of them had not applied because they had to cease all activities due to Covid-19.

Finally, only 16% of organizations said they would apply to the Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA), most of them not holding the minimum assets to obtain a loan through the program. The dependency of the Canadian arts and culture sector upon the state is contributing in a very important way to its own precarity because it leaves it particularly vulnerable to any social, economc and/or political crisis. 

The IMF chief economist Gita Gopinath predicted that following Covid-19 we will experiment the worst recession since the Great Depression. What will then happen to the Canadian public funding model for the arts and culture and to artists? Will we go back to our old policies providing them with basically no safety net? As the Canadian government is spending massively in order to protect workers and the economy, what awaits the arts and culture sector is preoccupying precisely because it does not generate as much profits as other sectors. When the government’s pockets will be empty, who will it sacrifice first? This question calls for a deeper reflexion on what we value as a society. Let’s hope that the Great Lockdown will have shown to the people who were not already aware of it that the arts and culture are essential to our society. 

In its current state, both our national social protection system and the arts and culture sector’s dependency on the state are not sustainable. It is time to start a conversation about how we can imagine new models that would provide all workers – as citizens– with a set of social and political rights that are disconnected from their contribution to the economy in general and as “standard employees” in particular. We also need to think about ways to shield the arts and culture sector from both market and institutional pressures. Freeing artists and cultural organizations from their dependency on a state that does not efficiently protect them would empower them. 

From a legal standpoint, I doubt that the improvement of the artist’s socioeconomic condition will solely come from the current ongoing revision of the Canadian Copyright Act and both Status of the Artist Acts in Quebec[5]. A different way to empower artists could be through interprofessional unionization based on the employment status, as suggested by French author Aurélien Catin[6]. This is an interesting idea in the context where sectoral collective bargaining such as in Quebec’s performing arts has not proven capable of providing better work for artists since it was put in place in 1987[7]. The union S’ATTAQ, affiliated to the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), is currently organizing self-employed workers including artists in Quebec. 

Laurence Dubuc, “Artists are Screwed in the COVID-19 Era: What Implications for Labour Policies” Canadian Law of Work Forum (April 27 2020): https://lawofwork.ca/?p=12398


[1]Hill Strategies Research Inc. (November 17th, 2019). “A Statistical Profile of Artists in Canada in 2016”. Online, https://hillstrategies.com/resource/statistical-profile-of-artists-in-canada-in-2016/

[2]Observatoire de la culture et des communications du Québec. (2013). “Les artistes en arts visuels: Portrait statistique des conditions de pratique au Québec”. Online, https://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/statistiques/culture/arts-visuels/mono-arts-visuels.pdf

[3]Observatoire de la culture et des communications du Québec. (2011). “Les danseurs et les chorégraphes québécois. Portrait des conditions de pratique de la profession de la danse au Québec”. Online, https://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/statistiques/culture/arts-scene/danseurs-choregraphes/danseurs-choregraphes.pdf

[4]Caillou, A. (April 14th, 2020). “Des artistes se disent confiants de s’en sortir”. Online, https://www.ledevoir.com/culture/576940/coronavirus-les-artistes-se-disent-satisfaits-des-mesures-d-aide-du-federal

[5]Act respecting the professional status and conditions of engagement of performing, recording and film artists, CQLR c S-32.1;Act respecting the professional status of artists in the visual arts, arts and crafts and literature, and their contracts with promoters,CQLR c S-32.01

[6]Catin, A. (2020). “Notre Condition: Essai sur le salaire au travail artistique“. Riot. 

[7]Choko, M. (2014). “L’autonomie collective au service de la protection des travailleurs autonomes: comment favoriser leur accès à un travail décent à la lumière du cas des artistes au Québec”, Doctoral dissertation, McGill Faculty of Law. 

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
Laurence Dubuc

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
A Modern Workforce Policy Calls for Both UBI and Gig Work Protections
next post
Thoughts on the Foodora Fiasco: Have Labour Laws Been Violated?

You may also like

Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure...

February 24, 2021

Flores v Scotlynn Sweetpac Growers Inc.: Migrant Workers...

February 3, 2021

Calling the Shots: Is Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination a...

January 29, 2021

Does COVID Justify Longer Periods of Reasonable Notice?

January 25, 2021

Canadian Bar Association Podcast: “After the Pandemic: Protecting...

December 17, 2020

Arbitrator: Employees Must Get Swabbed for COVID

December 16, 2020

“Autonomous Worker” Regulation

December 1, 2020

What Could Biden’s Labor Secretary Do?

November 12, 2020

Alberta Government Continues Rollback of Worker Protections

November 10, 2020

Dispatches from Canada on the Big California Uber...

October 23, 2020

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 218 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
24 Feb

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211853Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
24 Feb

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923168Like on Twitter 136462397617409231613Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
24 Feb

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.