The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Do Black Canadians Deserve to Earn 10-15% Less Than White Canadians?

by David Doorey March 8, 2011
written by David Doorey March 8, 2011

A new study from Statistics Canada reveals that second generation Black Canadians earn 10-15 percent less than second generation white Canadians.  So we are looking at people born in Canada to parents (or a single parent) who immigrated to Canada.  Here is the study. This is true even though Black males “are more likely to live in large centres and have higher levels of educational attainment.”    The pay gap is smallest between Chinese and white Canadians.  Here is a Globe and Mail article that discusses the study results.
What do you think explains these outcomes?
As allows, it depends on your perspective on labour markets and discrimination.  A neo-classical economist would say that Black Canadians are paid less because they must be less productive than white people, since they pretend that labour markets are perfectly competitive.  If Black Canadians were as productive or more productive than white workers, but accepted less pay, then rational profit-seeking employers would rush to hire all the Black workers they could find.  This would drive up their wages, since soon the demand for Black workers would outstrip supply, allowing Black workers to bargain higher pay. As a result, the lower pay of Black workers would be short term, since the invisible hand of the market would drive up their wages to that of the white workers.  Therefore, to the neo-classical economist, the explanation for the wage gap must be that Black workers are less productive than white workers (and therefore worth less).
Neo-classicalists give the same explanation for the gender wage gap: women are paid less because they are less productive than men.  That is why neo-classical economists (like Richard Epstein and the Fraser Institute, for example) object to human rights legislation that prohibits wage discrimination.  That legislation just artificially inflates wages above the market rate.  The market will ensure people are paid what they are worth.
The trouble with this rosy view of the world is that the wage gap between white and Black workers is persistent over time, AND Black workers have a much higher unemployment rate than white workers.   This Stats Can chart from the same study shows that the second generation Black workers have over double the unemployment rate (9.2%) of white workers (4.1%)!  This demonstrates clearly that employers do not shift to cheaper Black workers, as classical labour market theory predicts they will. Instead, they keep hiring white workers, who cost more and (according to the Stats Can study on second generation Canadians) have on average less education and training, which we usually associate with greater productivity.  How can classical economic theory explain this behavior?

Is it possible that employers do not make decisions about compensation purely on the basis of merit and productivity?  Or that they lack information about the relative productivity of Black and white workers?  Is it possible that employers just prefer having white workers?

That is certainly the belief upon which our human rights codes, pay equity, and employment equity legislation are predicated.  In other words, employers discriminate against classes of workers based on irrelevant factors not tied to their productivity, but to the employer’s bias and prejudice.  Stats Can does not attempt to explain the wage gap in this study, but it does note the possibility that wage discrimination is involved:

Wage discrimination may or may not be a contributing factor. Relatively little Canadian economics research has been carried out on this issue. In a randomized Canadian field experiment, Oreopoulis (2008) did find that job applicants with English-sounding names and Canadian experience were much more likely to be called for an interview (all other job and personal characteristics identical) than applicants with Asian-sounding names and foreign experience.

What do you think?  Do you think that the wage gap between Black and white workers is based on relative productivity, or prejudice (explicit or systemic) on behalf of Canadian employers?
Does the 10-15% wage gap between Black and white workers surprise you, given that wage discrimination n the basis of skin colour has been prohibited in Canada for decades by human rights legislation (see Section 5 of the Ontario Human Rights Code)?

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Jon Stewart on the Hypocricy of Political & Media Attacks on Public Sector Workers
next post
Don't Confuse Union Density with the Demand for Unionization

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law to the masses. @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @CLJEHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

TheLawofWork
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
josheidelson Josh Eidelson @josheidelson ·
5h

Scoop: Labor Board prosecutors have concluded Starbucks illegally refused to fairly negotiate at dozens of newly-unionized cafes across the country https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-28/starbucks-illegally-refused-to-bargain-on-zoom-nlrb-lawyer-says Starbucks’ refusal to negotiate if some workers participated via Zoom was illegal, NLRB general counsel says

Reply on Twitter 1640509028567506950 Retweet on Twitter 1640509028567506950 140 Like on Twitter 1640509028567506950 412 Twitter 1640509028567506950
Retweet on Twitter David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to Retweeted
alexisshotwell Alexis Shotwell @alexisshotwell ·
10h

This morning the president of @Carleton_U sent out a note underlining his understanding of “how painful labour disruptions can be to communities,” pleading for us to be calm and respectful and to support our students at the end of term. 1/

Reply on Twitter 1640430514627551256 Retweet on Twitter 1640430514627551256 84 Like on Twitter 1640430514627551256 242 Twitter 1640430514627551256
thelawofwork David J. Doorey🇨🇦 @TheLawofWork@mas.to @thelawofwork ·
12h

Oh fun.

‘AI is on the cusp of taking control: This is how it may all go wrong’

https://apple.news/AWvPXyT8WTVOs5byQvVk-3Q

Reply on Twitter 1640408084093779989 Retweet on Twitter 1640408084093779989 1 Like on Twitter 1640408084093779989 3 Twitter 1640408084093779989
Load More

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Newfoundland
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.