Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
  • Home
  • About
    • Professor David Doorey
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Student Blog Initiative
Canadian Law of Work Forum (CLWF)
Law of Work Archive

An Interesting Synergy Between Toronto and Wisconsin Politics?

by David Doorey January 18, 2012
written by David Doorey January 18, 2012

Yesterday sure was an interesting day in Wisconsin and here in Toronto, and the events that occurred share an interesting synergy.
In case you missed it, the Governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker, ran on a promise to cut spending and dismantle public sector unions and collective bargaining. Sound familiar?
Walker was elected Governor, and proceeded to introduce some of the most drastic anti-collective bargaining legislation seen in the past century anywhere in the Western world.  For example, he passed a law banning public sector collective bargaining over all issues except wages, but a wage increase above cost of living could only be given to public sector workers after a public referendum approved it.  The law would also require annual decertification votes by public sector workers, even if no employees expressed a wish to be decertified.  Read a review of the changes in this Guest Blog by Professor Paul Secunda. This provoked a huge resistance movement and mass protests around the state.  Then, in November of that last year, a campaign began to “recall” the governor.  Recall legislation is usually backed by conservative politicians as a way to allow the public to oust a politician midterm that does something–like raising taxes–that voters don’t like.  This time, the recall targeted not a high tax politician, but a cost-cutting one who attacks unions.

The recall movement garnered a shocking number of signatures, over 1 million, according to recent reports.
Only 540,208 signatures are needed to require a vote to replace Walker.  Only 3 times in the history of the United States have Those petitions were filed yesterday.  This means it is very likely that the Governor will face a recall election this spring.  Of course, the Republicans plan to drag this out as long as possible by insisting that every single signature be verified, while the Governor continues with his multi-million dollar advertising campaign funded by huge corporate donors.
Meanwhile, back in Toronto, our own Mayor lost a big battle in Council yesterday over his desired spending cuts. Council turned against the Mayors’ Ford, and voted against some $15 million dollars in service cuts that the Fords and their allies had expected to be approved.  Ford’s popularity has plummeted since his election.  If we had recall legislation for Mayor’s here, I’m pretty confident a movement would have begun.
In both Toronto and Wisconsin, populist politicians who ran on cutting public spending and destroying unions have run into an unexpected backlash.  History shows us that when you swing the political pendulum too far in one direction, it always swings back.  We may be seeing that now in Toronto and Wisconsin.  
The next question for Toronto is whether the Mayors Ford can succeed in their promise to eliminate the job security provisions in the public sector collective agreements.  Already, the City is pulling back.  In it’s last offer to CUPE 416, it proposed keeping the job security but only for workers with more than 25 years’ service instead of the 10 year cutoff in the old agreement.  The union is offering a three year wage freeze.
Can the City win a public relations battle if it forces a work stoppage over job security protections for workers with between 10-25 years’ service?

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is the Director of the School of HRM at York and Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and on the Advisory Board of the Osgoode Certificate program in Labour Law. He is a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program and a member of the International Advisory Committee on Harvard University’s Clean Slate Project, which is re-imaging labor law for the 21st century

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

previous post
York Region Cancels Contract with Struck Bus Service Provider: Lawful?
next post
UPDATE: Anatomy of a Work Stoppage — City Blinks!

You may also like

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

A Successful Strike Vote is All That Stands...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Putin Invites Trump to Moscow for Second Meeting...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 219 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

CLWFFollow

CLWF
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
RSandillRicha Sandill@RSandill·
24 Feb

@SCLSclinic and I were so fortunate to represent this client last year. I am thrilled that this decision brings more clarity for family status accommodations rights amidst a pandemic that has tested parents, caregivers, and families like never before. https://twitter.com/CanLawWorkForum/status/1364605259071561730

CLWF@CanLawWorkForum

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364627677785821185Retweet on Twitter 13646276777858211851Like on Twitter 13646276777858211853Twitter 1364627677785821185
Retweet on TwitterCLWF Retweeted
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey@TheLawofWork·
24 Feb

Here's my latest in @jacobinmag.

If Ontario's labor laws applied in Alabama, the Amazon vote would have been held months ago so workers could get back to their jobs. Instead, the NLRA permits Amazon to conduct a months' long onslaught of anti-union propaganda. https://twitter.com/jacobinmag/status/1364613560425275392

Jacobin@jacobinmag

Amazon workers in Alabama are voting on whether to unionize, but the company is bombarding them with anti-union propaganda. In Canada, by contrast, votes are held quickly, making it harder for companies to stack the deck — a model that can work in the US. http://jacobinmag.com/2021/02/amazon-alabama-canada-labor-law-union-vote

Reply on Twitter 1364623976174092316Retweet on Twitter 13646239761740923168Like on Twitter 136462397617409231613Twitter 1364623976174092316
CanLawWorkForumCLWF@CanLawWorkForum·
24 Feb

New from @RSandill (counsel for applicant), discussing important new "family status" discrimination decision from OHRT:

"Kovintharajah v. Paragon Linen & Laundry: When Failure to Accommodate Child Care Needs is “Family Status” Discrimination"

https://lawofwork.ca/13360-2/

Reply on Twitter 1364605259071561730Retweet on Twitter 13646052590715617304Like on Twitter 13646052590715617304Twitter 1364605259071561730
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.