The Law of Work
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
  • Home
  • About
  • Professor David Doorey
  • Osgoode Hall LLM
  • Books
  • Guest Contributors
  • Useful Links
    • Archive
The Law of Work
Law of Work Archive

Privacy Commissioner Joins Chorus in Condemning Employers Who Seek Passwords to Social Media Accounts

by David Doorey May 3, 2012
written by David Doorey May 3, 2012

Those of us who have argued that it is unlawful (and immoral) for employers to demand secret passwords to social media accounts of job applicants received more support today from Ontario’s Privacy Commissioner.
By way of review, I took the position that asking job applicants to disclose their private Facebook passwords would violate Section 23(2) of the Ontario Human Rights Code, since this is akin to asking for the key to a secret document that will allow the employer to see such things as the person’s marital status, religion, family status, sexual orientation, disability, or ethnicity. My view was that the Code prohibits employers from seeking to obtain this information during the recruitment process, either through direct requests or indirect requests that allow the employer to obtain the information through the backdoor.
Subsequently, the Human Rights Commission issued a statement warning that “the OHRC believes employers should not ask job applicants for access to information stored on social media or other online sites and that doing so could leave an employer open to a claim of discrimination under the Code.”
The position that it is unlawful under the Code for employers to demand secret passwords from job applicatns is not without detractors, and I referred everyone to the blog post prepared by Dan Michaluk from Hicks Morley, who argued that the Code does not prohibit an employer from asking for a Facebook password, only from relying on information about prohibited grounds that might be seen in the secret vault . I understand that argument, but  I respectfully disagreed with it because: (1) the Code is required to be interpreted expansively to protect human rights, and (2)  if that argument succeeds, then Section 23(2) of the Code is basically meaningless, since Section 5 of the Code already prohibited employers from ‘acting’ on any information about prohibited grounds.  In my view, Section 23 deals not with employers who rely on inappropriate information, but with the manner in which employers attempt to obtain that information during the recruitment process.
Anyhow, old news.  But I mention it all again because today Ontario Privacy Commissioner, Ann Cavoukian, announced that in her view it is “fundamentally wrong” for an employer to ask current or potential employees for personal passwords.  In a paper she has published (Reference Check: Is Your Boss Watching?) to help guide employers and employees, Cavoukian writes:

Employers cannot ask for information that may directly or indirectly reveal a prohibited ground of discrimination. In Ontario, requests for this kind of information may also put the employer at risk of a lawsuit as an unreasonable intrusion into not only an applicant’s private activities, but also the activities of their “friends.

Mark Ellis, and employer-side employment lawyer at Baker McKenzie in Toronto is quoted in the article saying that Baker lawyers advise employers that “probing beyond the password-protected wall constitutes unwarranted invasion of privacy.”
Is it now safe to assume that there is an emerging consensus in the employment law community that demanding passwords to social media accounts passes a legal and moral boundary in Canada?

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail
David Doorey

Professor Doorey is an Associate Professor of Work Law and Industrial Relations at York University. He is Academic Director of Osgoode Hall Law School’s executive LLM Program in Labour and Employment Law and a Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School’s Labor and Worklife Program. Professor Doorey is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B., Ph.D), London School of Economics (LLM Labour Law), and the University of Toronto (B.A., M.I.R.).

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

previous post
Labour Law Exam Question: Could Unionizing Help Zellers Employees Who Will be Turfed at Behest of Target?
next post
Watch Professor Brian Langille's Innis Christie Memorial Lecture

You may also like

This Blog Entry is About the Lunacy of...

July 21, 2019

A Cross Country Update on the Card-Check versus...

October 3, 2018

The Folly of Not Voting to Strike in...

September 16, 2018

Unifor Posts Photos of Replacement Workers as Gander...

September 10, 2018

A Wrongful Dismissal Case and the Absence of...

August 29, 2018

China Said to Quickly Withdraw Approval for New...

August 27, 2018

The Latest Hot E-Commerce Idea in China: The...

August 27, 2018

The Trump Administration Just Did Something Unambiguously Good...

August 27, 2018

Unstable Situations Require Police In Riot Gear Face...

August 27, 2018

Trump’s War on the Justice System Threatens to...

August 27, 2018

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 337 other subscribers

Follow Us On Social Media

Twitter

Latest Tweets

David J. Doorey🇨🇦Follow

Law Prof. Talking #labor & #employment #law #Gig to the masses. Alpaca ❤️ @YorkUniversity @OsgoodeNews @LSELaw @LWPHarvard @Jacobin @OnLaborBlog https://t.co/5V9r8VPHsh

David J. Doorey🇨🇦
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
13h

A Nationwide Bargaining Unit to Fight Starbucks Is a Moon Shot Worth Trying

My latest on ⁦@jacobin⁩. https://jacobin.com/2022/08/starbucks-service-unions-nlrb-law-centralized-bargaining/

Reply on Twitter 1556339370461786112Retweet on Twitter 15563393704617861122Like on Twitter 155633937046178611211Twitter 1556339370461786112
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
16h

Luck is part of it for sure. Right time right place. True of a lot of jobs not just academia.

But in my experience sitting on lots of academic hiring committees, people selected have superior CVs. 60 applicants, one position. Not all luck. It’s a very competitive job market.

David Webster@dwebsterhist

I've been hired for 2 tenure track jobs and been on multiple committees, sent in more than 100 job applications, and done multiple interviews. Here is my thread 🛢
of job market advice for early career academics based on decades of experience:

1. Get lucky.

Reply on Twitter 1556285407817506817Retweet on Twitter 1556285407817506817Like on Twitter 15562854078175068171Twitter 1556285407817506817
TheLawofWorkDavid J. Doorey🇨🇦@TheLawofWork·
6 Aug

Sunflowers!

Reply on Twitter 1556032894640037890Retweet on Twitter 1556032894640037890Like on Twitter 15560328946400378905Twitter 1556032894640037890
Load More...

Categories

  • Alberta
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Australia
  • British Columbia
  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Childcare
  • Class Action
  • Climate and Just Transition
  • Collective Bargaining
  • Common Law of Employment
  • Comparative Work Law
  • competition law
  • construction
  • COVID-19
  • Diversity
  • Employee Classification
  • Employment Insurance
  • Employment Regulation
  • Europe
  • Financial Industry
  • Fissured Work
  • Freedom of Association
  • frustration of contract
  • Gig Work
  • Health and Safety
  • Health Care
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Interest Arbitration
  • International Law
  • Labour Arbitration
  • Labour Economics
  • Law of Work Archive
  • Legal Profession
  • Manitoba
  • Migrant Workers
  • Minimum Wage
  • Nova Scotia
  • OLRB
  • Ontario
  • Pension Bankruptcy
  • Privacy
  • Public Sector
  • Quebec
  • Real Life Pleadings
  • Saskatchewan
  • Scholarship
  • Sports Labour
  • Strikes and Lockouts
  • Student Post
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • technology
  • Transnational Law
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions and Collective Bargaining
  • United States
  • Videos
  • Women and Work
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guest Contributors
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive
Menu
  • Legal Scholarship
  • Useful Links
  • Archive

2020. Canadian Law of Work Forum. All Rights Reserved.